Software comparison

MadMapper vs PIXERA

MadMapper is a projection-mapping tool, while PIXERA is a media server — they overlap in places but are often used together rather than as substitutes.

MadMapperPIXERA
DeveloperGarageCUBE & 1024 ArchitectureAV Stumpfl
CountrySwitzerland / FranceAustria
CategoryProjection-mapping softwareMedia servers
PlatformsmacOS, WindowsWindows
LicencePerpetual licence (rental options)Paid licences (free version with limitations)
Skill levelBeginner → ProPro
First release2011—
Best forArchitectural mapping, LED installations and fast set-ups by small teams.Permanent attractions, theme parks, touring shows.
Key features
  • Surface & mesh warping
  • Edge blending
  • LED & DMX/Art-Net pixel mapping
  • Spatial scanner
  • Built-in generative materials
  • MiniMad hardware player
  • Syphon/Spout & NDI input
  • Real-time 3D media server
  • Projection mapping & auto-calibration
  • Timeline & control
  • Large-scale multi-output

Verdict

Only MadMapper runs on macOS.

Choose MadMapper for architectural mapping, LED installations and fast set-ups by small teams.

Choose PIXERA for permanent attractions, theme parks, touring shows.

Facts are curated and checked against vendor websites; licences and prices change — always confirm on the official sites before buying.

MadMapper alternatives · PIXERA alternatives · All software